Politics and the drama surrounding politics are always interesting. And moments for applause are sometimes continuous. I have watched all the debates and when asked who won, I had to stop and think real hard; and only because there were no real knock-outs. Clearly there were moments when the candidates gave coherence and meaning to an idea/point-of-view, but for us spectators, and I for one in particular, yearned for that compelling moment which would quiet the noise of the lesser among them. On recall ,who were winners? While I cannot anoint anyone, from my perch I recall no gaffes, neither was anyone elbowed out of the game. Real differences– no! Few among either the Dems or Republicans. Of course there were strident voices–Senator Clinton emphasizes ” This is Bush’s war”. Senator Obama tries to knock the breath out of Edwards’ argument on the war–that he was four and half years late in opposing it. Former governor, Mike Huckabee, scored for the GOP declaring his faith “God created the heaven and the earth– you believe it, or you don’t“. Great moments of passion, but short of I GOT YOU!

Debates are expected to create an added dynamic in the game. Change minds, move numbers in one direction or the other and in raw politics– politically damage your opponent. But all that was in short supply. A good game, but should we expect better? Absolutely! As I look forward to others, I must say the line up of eighteen (18) men and a woman on the political gang way has been elegant and well choreographed. But also present, were moments/mirrors created for self reflection and grandeur and written in the story line, and in very fine print. That of course comes with the territory. The vanity, egotism” I am here to save you“– as was the tale of Caesar of Rome, becomes apparent. Is that grandeur bad for politics. Not necessarily so. But is the desire for fame and glory a part of the politician’s strip tease as we the humble, shout “viva”. Purpose and resolve spells pragmatic politics. Fame and ambition can be lethal.

In the theater of politics seeking applause has become paramount; while honors real or imagined are sought by everyone. Such interests are apparent whether one is of the barbarians or from among the highly civilized. That such likes are universal, does not necessarily improve the game. Debates even without clearly defined winners now have clearly defined stars– and as groupies we cheer them on. Sometimes never shouting loud enough for the answers we so desperately seek about the issues that concern us. Have we become enablers to a fault? In the shuffle, have we miss out on the politics behind the politics. Who loses? The electorate? Not sure of the answers but I am ready for round two. Thoughts?


Immigration Showdown!

Immigration showdown–what’s next? The fragile coalition that held together the immigration bill that sought to bring answers to 12 million undocumented workers, has collapsed. Concerns about its passage became apparent after the Senate adopted amendments that punched holes in the guest worker program. In disarray Democrats tried to push the bill forward, but a nail- biter for both sides, they have not succeeded. Immigration reform like a car off the road, now rests in a ditch with wheels spinning. The question is…. what’s next?

The collapse of the bill shows the influence of conservatives, who adamantly opposed the bill. The results are of course, a set back for the President and Democrats who strongly supported its passage. The conclusion– it will be shelved and not considered for many months. Does the failure of this bill show weakness among Democrats and their ability to build a coalition? Will this No Vote give new energy to republican candidates seeking the presidency? Were you surprised at the outcome? Should focus on border security be among the first steps to reform? Thoughts?

VernaSmith