After yet another debate between Senators Clinton and Obama, we awaited the the Lloyd Bensten moment, but alas, there was none. If anything the (19 ?) debate among the two came to a close, with nothing ‘dramatic’. Expectations for this one? The stakes were high for Clinton. It was to be her chance to re-define herself, while Barack maintained his “cool” and momentum as the front runner. But clearly there was no gaffes and no soundbites that really stuck. On my part there were no fireworks!
Throughout, Hillary Clinton was her usual self, “the policy wonk,” giving more of the same when questioned on: Cuba, the economy, immigration, her readiness to become Commander-in-Chief, etc. Her answers generally explained her “experience” as the “solutions” candidate and in the process accused Obama of plagiarism– lifting lines from a speech by Governor Patrick Deval of Massachusetts. As she puts it “Lifting whole passages is not about CHANGE you can believe in, but change you can XEROX”. That was the zinger and killer line for the night. How did that go over. Senator Clinton was booed as Obama responded ” we are experiencing a silly season in politics”. He went went on to say that they instead of that attack, they should be focusing on the issues of finding a solution to war, addressing the economy, among other things. On this surprisingly, he took the high road. I was looking to see flashes of anger– a harsh response…. he just moved on the next question. So who won the debate? Well no one ” messed up politically” it was a draw, ‘Even Steven ‘ in my perspective.
Another debate follows in Ohio in another few days, after which we will see who claims victory in the March 4, primaries.
Nevertheless, Obama closes the gap. Trailing Clinton in Ohio and Texas weeks ago, now the latest ABC/Washington Post poll which took at look at how the race is shaping up finds that Obama is clearly in striking distance.
- Texas Clinton 48% Obama 47%
- Ohio Clinton 50% Obama 43%
This is interpreted, dead- heat. However, one (1/4) quarter of those polled in Texas and one (1/3) in Ohio are undecided or could change their minds.
As the horse-race continues, ThePolitico reports that Senator Clinton is struggling to keep going. For instance, in January Hillary was in debt, $7.6 million, not including the $5million personal loan made to her campaign. In contrast Senator Obama, reports raising approximately $37 million. His cash balance is $25 million of which $20 million can be spent on the primary. So has we talk ‘management and fiscal affairs” even at this level, Obama emerges as the better manager.
So would any of this be a ‘predictor’ if how one would run the country if elected? That question has become a part of the ‘buzz’. The same is true for the words: judgement, experience, fiscal responsibility and management style. Senator Clinton is doing a make-over in style and ‘strategy’ Obama is doubling numbers and productivity.
So whomever wins the March 4 primaries, he/she is expected to become the nominee; but is that where it will end? And without the intervention of ….. Super-Delegates. There is no doubt, this is crunch time. To Clinton and Obama I say ‘” play it for all its worth”!
VernaSmith
